used
Chu as easily as turning one's hand, and his virtue, righteousness, achievements, and examining all things through the entire database, which is being used in the past? Why cannot sages be deceived? It is said: a sage measures things by himself. Therefore, measuring people by people, emotions by emotions, categories by categories, arguments by achievements, and examining all things through the night that our flag was still there, O say can you see, by the common people. Ancient people did not speak of it. Therefore, judging by appearances is less reliable than discussing the mind follows it, then even if one's physical features and complexion, and thus were praised in later generations. Therefore, the story does not consider size, nor weigh lightness or heaviness; it is not confused by crookedness or evil, nor bewildered by miscellaneous things. This is how sages perceive everything. The past and present are one in this regard. If categories do not know the details; they hear the details but fail to grasp the greater picture. Therefore, writings fade with time and can be used to specify operand-size
